Understanding Judicial Decision-Making and Hearing Quality in Child Welfare

2018 - 2022

​​​This project will support the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (OPRE) and the Children’s Bureau (CB) in the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in developing design options for a study or group of studies to better understand 1) judicial decision-making during the life of a child welfare case as well as the quality of child welfare court proceedings, 2) the factors associated with decision-making and hearing quality, and 3) the influence that decision-making and hearing quality may have on case planning and outcomes such as parent engagement in services and children’s permanency outcomes.

Under this task order, James Bell Associates, in collaboration with the American Bar Association as well as Drs. Gatowski and Summers, will build upon the relevant research findings and recent developments within the Court Improvement Projects. Specific project activities include:

  • Assessing the knowledge base related to judicial decision-making and hearing quality in child welfare cases.
  • Developing a conceptual model of key constructs related to judicial decision-making and hearing quality.
  • Identifying methods, measures, and data sources that align with the identified constructs as well as effective and efficient strategies to access and link reliable and valid administrative data.
  • Developing design options for a study or group of studies that examine how judges make determinations in child welfare cases as well as the quality of child welfare hearings and reviews, the factors that contribute to and the outcomes associated with decision-making and hearing quality, and the influence that decision-making and hearing quality may have on case planning and outcomes.
  • Conducting pre-testing and feasibility activities for the selected components of the design options.
  • Taking steps to carry out a selected design option or options.

Point(s) of contact: Alysia Blandon and Christine Fortunato.

Information collections related to this project have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs under ACF’s Generic Clearance for Formative Data Collections for ACF Research (OMB #0970-0356). Related materials are available at the Understanding Judicial Decision-Making and Hearing Quality in Child Welfare: Descriptive Study of Child Welfare Courts page on RegInfo.gov.

Related Resources

Understand the Reasonable Efforts Finding Study, what it seeks to learn about factors that affect a judge’s reasonable efforts decision, data the study will collect, the study sample, and why it is important to the legal community.

Learn about research on child welfare court hearing quality and how it affects case processing and outcomes.

This document highlights research on court practices and court system resources that relate to judicial decision-making and hearing quality in child welfare court cases.

This document describes how the Compendium of Measures and Data Sources: Understanding Judicial Decision-Making and Hearing Quality in Child Welfare can be a valuable resource for child welfare legal professionals.

Explore a conceptual model that describes how components of judicial decision-making and child welfare hearing quality relate to the case process and outcomes for children and families.

Understand the Reasonable Efforts Finding Study design, what it seeks to learn about factors that affect a judge’s reasonable efforts decision, data the study will collect through case file reviews and court observation, the study sample, and its importance to the legal community.

The purpose of the Compendium is to summarize information about the types and range of measures and data sources used to study judicial decision-making and hearing quality in child welfare cases.

This webinar discusses research examining judicial decision-making and hearing quality in child welfare court cases and why court and legal professionals should be aware of research findings.